Timothy P. Carney, at the Washington Examiner, summarizes Gosnell's defense: This is just abortion. Gosnell's lawyer said "The purpose of the shot is to kill the baby so that it will not be a live birth." At least the defense admits those were babies getting killed in utero.
If the babies were murdered before birth and therefore were not alive after birth, why did Gosnell "snip" their necks?
Once the jury announces its verdict, the world can put this episode away and continue pretending that abortion is a "medical procedure".